The Durham News
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Register / Log In
High: 43°
Low:  26°
35.0 °
5-Day Forecast
Site Search

Front Home / Front  




Published: Jan 06, 2013 07:00 PM
Modified: Jan 02, 2013 01:43 PM

Hearing Tuesday on rule to separate group homes
 

 

 

 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here

What’s Next

A draft ordinance to require a 1,125-foot separation between group homes and family-care homes will be presented for public comment at the Durham Planning Commission meeting, 5:30 p.m. Tuesday in the Council Chamber, City Hall.


More information

What’s In a Name?

“Group home” can refer to any dwelling where unrelated individuals live while receiving services. Durham and state ordinances, though, have specific terms – and rules – for different group-living situations.

• Family Care Home – Residence for up to six individuals who require care and supervision due to age, illness, handicap or other special need; state-regulated.

• Group Home – Residence for seven to 12 individuals who require care and supervision due to age, illness, handicap or other special need; state-regulated.

• Congregate Living Facility – Housing for more than 12 individuals that provides meals and personal services, such as nursing homes; state-regulated.

• Group Living – Housing for fewer than 13 individuals that provide addiction, mental health and/or post-incarceration care or supervision; not state-regulated.

• Rooming House – Dwelling with four to nine rental rooms; not state-regulated.

• Boarding House – Same as Rooming House, but also provides at least one meal per day; not state-regulated.

• Commercial Dormitory – Housing for 13 or more individuals, with no care or meals provided; not state-regulated.

• Social Service Institution – Residence that provides addiction and/or psychiatric and/or post-incarceration treatment and supervision for more than 12 individuals.

Source: Durham City-County Planning Department


More Front
Deer hunting gets push in city
Apartments replacing former motel
Plan for disconnected youth to get closer look
751 South renews drive for annexation to Durham

Most Popular

As promised in September, city-county planners have drafted a rule to block group homes from clustering in particular, typically low-income, neighborhoods.

But some community members who live near such clusters say it won’t do enough to solve a growing problem.

“We need the actual registration of all group homes in this city,” said Northeast Central Durham homeowner Vivian McCoy.

“Group home” is a catchall term for residences housing multiple individuals with disabilities, addictions or in transition from institutional care. Under state and federal law, though, “group home” is one of several specific types of housing, each with its own definitions and supervision responsibilities (see sidebar on p. X).

Durham’s proposed ordinance goes to a public hearing Tuesday night by the Durham Planning Commission.

It requires two types of homes – “family care” and “group homes” – to be at least 1,125 feet apart. That is a bit less than a quarter-mile, enough to prevent group homes setting up next to each other or dominating whole blocks, as residents say has happened in Northeast Central Durham, a long-blighted area struggling to revive itself.

“When you have a halfway house or a rooming house, typically it may attract people who have been on the margins or are on the margins, and sometimes that creates an environment where there can be trouble attracted to those places,” said NECD homeowner Ernest Smith.

“We just want to guard against a concentration that would cause our neighborhood to be something other than what it should be,” he said.

Complaints

Complaints last summer by Smith, McCoy and others who have group homes for neighbors moved elected officials to order up the draft separation rule. But making it work is something else.

Proving that a residence is, first, subject to the rule, and, second, in violation of it, can be difficult, said Planning Director Steve Medlin, and city inspection personnel are already stretched thin.

County Commissioner Ellen Reckhow, like McCoy, wants mandatory registration for group-home operators.

“These group homes are not supervised,” McCoy said. “The persons that own these homes are not there 24 hours a day. ... Are they certified to care for mentally ill people? This is not simple.”

Authorities don’t know how many group homes there are, or where they are, in Durham County. After comparing notes with several other agencies, planners counted 210 last year, but those are only establishments for which one public agency or another has a record.

“You don’t know ... but people are allowed to do it,” said NECD resident James Chavis. “Does that help our area?”

A map based on the planners’ list shows a group-homes concentration in Northeast Central Durham, but they are spread across the county.

Mayor Pro Tem Cora Cole-McFadden has lived in the middle-class Old Farm neighborhood of northern Durham for years.

“For the first time, I saw a resident, drunk as a fish, walking up my street on his way to his group home,” she said recently. “A person with a mental disability.”

What’s more, she said, she had met someone planning to open another group home about two blocks away.

“It’s beginning to happen all over Durham,” she said.

Wise: 919-641-5895
advertisements
Advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2013, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About our ads | Copyright | Parental Consent | Help | Contact Us | N&O Store | Advertising
Member of the
Real Cities Network
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com